The Journal for Literary and Intermedial Crossings (ISSN 2506-8709; www.jlic.be) offers an online publication platform to researchers who wish to explore various aesthetic ‘crossings’ concerning media, genres and/or spaces. Targeted squarely at investigating the ‘in-between,’ the journal seeks contributions from scholars broadly covering medial, literary, generic, spatial and cultural crossings that bridge a plurality of potential discourses, modalities, and methodologies. This special issue on “Depicting Destitution across Media” brings together different approaches to intermedial depictions of poverty. It asks how a focus on poverty can reinvigorate theories and methods for the literary and cultural analysis of representations of social inequality. In particular, it addresses the ways in which intermedial and transmedial perspectives enhance our understanding of such depictions.
The “new poverty studies,” which took shape primarily in Anglo-American scholarship in recent decades, is indebted to the Marxist tradition but springs from the observation that “class analysis often fails to focus sharply on what poverty means as a social category” (Jones 2008, p. 8; also see Goode and Maskovsky 2001). It asks how the study of the system of capitalist production and consumption can be complemented by more focused attention to “the individuals and groups who have remained partly excluded from it” (Jones p. 8). How can the “socioeconomic suffering” (Jones, p. 3) of poverty serve as a critical lens that opens up clearer perspectives on social inequality? How may this critical lens be sharpened with the help of theoretical formations from fields such as working-class studies, critical ethnic studies, gender and sexuality studies, and disability studies? Might it even help us address what Walter Benn Michaels has called “the trouble with diversity,” i.e. the tension between the affirmation of difference that many see at the heart of identity politics and the (more unpopular) critique of economic inequality?
With this topical issue, we seek to encourage dialogue between political and economic inquiries and studies of artistic and media representations. More specifically, contributions need to address the intersection between central questions in poverty studies (e.g. Desmond and Western 2018; Lemke 2014; Hill Collins 2012; Butter and Schinko 2010; Jones 2008) and intermediality studies’ concern with borders and in-between spaces within various forms of mediation (e.g. Bem 2017; Rajewsky 2010; Müller 2010).
In particular, we would like to consider the gaps and tensions inherent in representations of poverty in literature and other media and, particularly, in intermedial forms. As the presence of poverty in so-called developed nations in the global North has tended to “antagonize the liberal assumptions of freedom and universality that underpin a market economy” (Jones, 2008, p. 1), representations often fail to address the ways in which poverty is (re-)produced by existing social and economic arrangements in which audiences, producers, and representations may all be implicated in different ways. Instead, many representations of poverty keep the poor at arm’s length. Poverty evidently persists despite the fact that it is regularly “discovered” by the larger public to the extent that “images of poverty [have become] a staple of liberal society’s guilt” (Rabinowitz 4). In other words, while representations frequently claim to be bridging social gaps, often by combining different media (Agee and Evans 2001 , p. 10), distancing practices structure countless dimensions of our social world (Bourdieu; Harvey) and of ubiquitous cultural representations. We agree with Eric Schocket’s claim that scholarship needs to “hold[…] representations accountable as operations deeply implicated in the exploitive relations they seek to document” (2006, p. 11). In this context, it is also worth considering whether and how intermedial representations may escape or exacerbate such dynamics.
We invite papers that address these or related questions:
The range of relevant cultural forms and practices includes but is not limited to poetry, fiction, spoken drama, protest performances, opera, film, television, and multimedia Internet platforms.
Please send an abstract of maximum 500 words (in English and, if applicable, also in the language of your article, i.e. Dutch, French, German, Italian or Spanish) and a list of 5 keywords (in the same (two) language(s)) and a 100-word author bio (in English only) to firstname.lastname@example.org and to email@example.com by 15 June 2021. The deadline for full articles will be 1 October 2021. Articles should be between 5,000 and 6,000 words long (references and footnotes included) and can be written in Dutch, English, French, German, Italian or Spanish. JLIC supports textual as well as multi-media formatting. All work submitted to JLIC should reference and be formatted according to its Author Guidelines. Articles may be submitted in Word format. Figures, video and audio files etc. should be saved separately from the text. Potential contributors should bear in mind that a two-stage review process is envisaged for full essays. In the first stage, articles will be reviewed by the guest editors. In the second stage, articles will be double-blind peer-reviewed by at least one external anonymous expert referee.
For the pdf version of this Call for Articles. click here.
JLIC considers all manuscripts on the strict condition that: