CLIC is very happy to announce the MERLIT International Conference: "Writing Meritocracy: Figurations of a Concept Across Literary History and Contexts of Literary Production". The conference will take place from 18 to 20 September 2025 at the Learning and Innovation Centre, Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Confirmed keynote speakers are Cathy Shrank, Professor of Early Modern Literature and Culture (University of Sheffield) and Madhu Krishnan, Professor of Contemporary African Writing (University of Bristol).
This conference is hosted by the EU-funded project Meritocracy and Literature: Transcultural Approaches to Hegemonic Forms. It is jointly organised by Eva Ulrike Pirker, Suzanne Scafe and Maria Pace Aquilina.
To register: https://events.vub.be/writing-meritocracy/register
Contact: merlit@vub.be
Although initially gaining traction through Michael Young’s scathing political satire The Rise of the Meritocracy (1958), the term ‘meritocracy’, as well as the concept behind it, rapidly became part and parcel of the ‘ideas we live by’ across the globe (Littler 2017). Today, both the paradigm and its concrete application in a variety of social contexts have once more become targets of criticism, and yet they continue to shape social environments and cultural narratives in myriad ways. Whilst research into meritocratic thought and culture has had great currency across disciplines in the past decades – including, more recently, the humanities – a number of limitations can be observed in existing approaches: Firstly, the bulk of scholarly engagements treat meritocratic thought as a current, or recent, phenomenon. Notably, already Young saw meritocratic narratives operating prior to the industrial revolution (Young 1958), and Kwame Anthony Appiah argues that they are traceable back at least to European antiquity (Appiah 2018). However, historical perspectives that would enable us to explore the longue-durée continuities of such narratives remain rare. Secondly, concepts such as “every man forges his own fortune” – perhaps the most potent meritocratic myth of all – have travelled widely; not only across time but also across cultural, geographical and linguistic contexts, often encountering pre-existing local variants or counternarratives. There remains a significant lacuna in tracing ‘meritocratic’ narratives beyond Western contexts, and in a variety of transcultural contact zones. Thirdly, among the body of research emerging from the humanities, contributions from the field of literary studies have remained scarce (e.g. Robbins 2007). This is surprising when considering the manifold reciprocal relationships between literature on the one hand, and cultural narratives on the other. Literary studies — with their inter-disciplinary components of literary history, formal analysis, and their translational engagement with the world — arguably provide an ideal tool for an exploration of meritocratic narratives that operate as latent hegemonic forms.
This conference seeks to contribute to the field of meritocracy studies from a literary perspective. We propose to explore “how literature participates” – over time and in a variety of contexts across the globe – in the construction, circulation and critique of meritocratic thought (Cheah 2017). By assembling case studies that focus on a range of periods and literary traditions across the linguistic spectrum, we seek to approach meritocratic narratives through the lens of literature, and as a world-literary phenomenon. In order to better understand the reciprocal relations between meritocratic narratives and literary forms, this conference aims to engage with meritocratic narratives as a theme, and formation, in literary works as well as investigating the impact of meritocratic narratives on the production and reception of literary works in a given context.
How are narratives of achievement framed in plays, in narrative and poetic texts? How are they shaped in specific ways as forms? Which narratives of achievement, progress and entitlement are especially dominant in a given literary work, genre or context? How is a spectrum of such narratives presented and negotiated in and through literature? What is the role of literature in the perpetuation of meritocratic paradigms? And what of the position and role of individual authors (across the spectrum of gender, provenance, social strata) in projecting and enabling such paradigms? To what extent is literature as a cultural practice itself subjected to, and co-opted by meritocratic frameworks? Can it exist outside meritocratic frameworks? Can literature provide a space for unmasking and resisting problematically hegemonic concepts of valorisation? We look forward to exploring and discussing these and related questions at the Vrije Universiteit in Brussels.
References: Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Lies that Bind: Rethinking Identity. New York: Liveright, 2018. Cheah, Pheng. “Worlding Literature: Living with Tiger Spirits.” Diacritics 45.2 (2017): 86-114. Littler, Jo. Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility. New York: Routledge, 2017. Robbins, Bruce. Upward Mobility and the Common Good: Toward a Literary History of the Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Young, Michael. The Rise of the Meritocracy: 1870- 2033; An Essay on Education and Equality. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1958.
